Skip to content Skip to sidebar Skip to footer
Accueil / How Many People Are Jailed Again

How Many People Are Jailed Again

Enregistrer un commentaire

This article is about backsliding in criminology and penology. For recidivism in medicine, see Backsliding (medicine).

"Repeat offender" redirects here. For other uses, see Repeat Offender.

Person repeating an undesirable behavior following punishment

Recidivism (; from recidive and ism, from Latin recidīvus "recurring", from re- "back" and cadō "I autumn") is the deed of a person repeating an undesirable beliefs afterward they accept experienced negative consequences of that behavior. Information technology is also used to refer to the percentage of former prisoners who are rearrested for a like crime.[1]

The term is frequently used in conjunction with criminal beliefs and substance use disorders. Backsliding is a synonym for "relapse", which is more commonly used in medicine and in the disease model of addiction.[ medical citation needed ]

U.s. [edit]

According to the latest study by the US Department of Justice, recidivism measures require three characteristics: one. a starting event, such every bit a release from prison two. a measure of failure post-obit the starting result, such as a subsequent arrest, confidence, or return to prison iii. an observation or follow-upwards period that generally extends from the date of the starting outcome to a predefined end appointment as in 6 months, 1 year, three years, 5 years, or 9 years).[2] The latest [Government study of backsliding] reported that 83% of state prisoners were arrested at some point in the ix years following their release. A big majority of those were arrested within the start 3 years, and more than 50% get rearrested inside the get-go twelvemonth. However, the longer the time period, the college the reported recidivism rate, only the lower the bodily threat to public condom.[two]

According to an April 2011 report by the Pew Middle on united states, the boilerplate national backsliding rate for released prisoners is 43%.[3]

According to the National Institute of Justice, almost 44 percent of the recently released return earlier the cease of their first year out. About 68 percent of 405,000 prisoners released in xxx states in 2005 were arrested for a new crime within three years of their release from prison house, and 77 percentage were arrested within v years, and by year nine that number reaches 83 per centum.[4]

Beginning in the 1990s, the US rate of incarceration increased dramatically, filling prisons to capacity in bad conditions for inmates. Criminal offence continues within many prison house walls. Gangs exist on the inside, often with tactical decisions made past imprisoned leaders.[five]

While the US justice organisation has traditionally focused its efforts at the front end of the system, past locking people up, it has not exerted an equal effort at the tail end of the organisation: decreasing the likelihood of reoffending among formerly incarcerated persons. This is a pregnant issue because ninety-five percentage of prisoners will be released back into the community at some signal.[6]

A cost study performed by the Vera Institute of Justice,[seven] a not-profit committed to decarceration in the United states of america, institute that the boilerplate per-inmate cost of incarceration among the xl states surveyed was $31,286 per year.[viii]

According to a national study published in 2003 by The Urban Plant, inside three years almost seven out of 10 released males will be rearrested and half will be back in prison.[five] The report says this happens due to personal and situation characteristics, including the individual'due south social environment of peers, family, customs, and state-level policies.[5]

In that location are many other factors in recidivism, such as the individual'southward circumstances before incarceration, events during their incarceration, and the period afterward they are released from prison, both firsthand and long term.

One of the main reasons why they find themselves back in jail is considering it is hard for the individual to fit back in with 'normal' life. They take to reestablish ties with their family, return to high-chance places and secure formal identification; they often take a poor work history and now accept a criminal record to deal with. Many prisoners study being anxious nearly their release; they are excited almost how their life will be unlike "this time" which does non always end up existence the example.[five]

[edit]

Of United states federal inmates in 2010 about half (51%) were serving time for drug offenses.[nine]

It is estimated that three quarters of those returning to prison have a history of substance utilize. Over 70 percent of mentally ill prisoners in the United States also accept a substance use disorder.[ten] Nevertheless, only 7 to 17 pct of prisoners who meet DSM criteria for a substance use disorder receive treatment.[11]

Persons who are incarcerated or otherwise accept compulsory involvement with the criminal justice system bear witness rates of substance use and dependence four times higher than those of the general population, yet fewer than xx per centum of federal and land prisoners who run into the pertinent diagnostic criteria receive treatment.[12]

Studies assessing the effectiveness of alcohol/drug handling have shown that inmates who participate in residential treatment programs while incarcerated have 9 to eighteen percent lower backsliding rates and 15 to 35 percent lower drug relapse rates than their counterparts who receive no treatment in prison.[xiii] Inmates who receive aftercare (treatment continuation upon release) demonstrate an even greater reduction in backsliding rate.[14]

Backsliding rates [edit]

Kingdom of norway has one of the lowest recidivism rates in the world at 20%.[15] Prisons in Norway and the Norwegian criminal justice organization focus on restorative justice and rehabilitating prisoners rather than penalization.[15]

The Us Department of Justice tracked the re-arrest, re-conviction, and re-incarceration of former inmates for three years later on their release from prisons in 15 states in 1994.[16] Key findings include:

  • Released prisoners with the highest rearrest rates were robbers (70.2%), burglars (74.0%), larcenists (74.6%), motor vehicle thieves (78.8%), those in prison for possessing or selling stolen property (77.four%) and those in prison for possessing, using or selling illegal weapons (70.ii%).
  • Within 3 years, two.5% of released rapists were arrested for another rape, and 1.2% of those who had served time for homicide were arrested for another homicide. These are the lowest rates of re-abort for the same category of criminal offense.
  • The 272,111 offenders discharged in 1994 had accumulated 4.1 one thousand thousand arrest charges before their most recent imprisonment and some other 744,000 charges within three years of release.

The Prison Policy Initiative analyzed the recidivism rates associated with diverse initial offenses and found that statistically, "people convicted of any violent offense are less likely to exist re-arrested in the years later release than those convicted of belongings, drug, or public gild offenses."[17]

The power of former criminals to achieve social mobility appears to narrow as criminal records become electronically stored and accessible.[xviii]

An defendant's history of convictions are called antecedents, known colloquially as "previous" or "form" in the UK and "priors" in the United states of america and Commonwealth of australia.

In that location are organizations that help with the re-integration of ex-detainees into club by helping them obtain work, education them various societal skills, and by providing all-effectually support.

In an effort to be more fair and to avoid calculation to already loftier imprisonment rates in the U.s.a., courts across America accept started using quantitative risk assessment software when trying to make decisions well-nigh releasing people on bond and sentencing, which are based on their history and other attributes.[19] It analyzed recidivism risk scores calculated by one of the nigh ordinarily used tools, the Northpointe COMPAS organization, and looked at outcomes over 2 years, and institute that merely 61% of those accounted high risk actually committed additional crimes during that menses and that African-American defendants were far more likely to be given high scores than white defendants.[nineteen]

The TRACER Act is intended to monitor released terrorists to prevent recidivism. Notwithstanding, rates of re-offending for political crimes are much less than for non-political crimes.[20]

African Americans and recidivism [edit]

With regard to the U.s.a. incarceration rate, African Americans stand for only about xiii percent of the United states of america population, still account for approximately half the prison house population as well as ex-offenders once released from prison.[21] Every bit compared to whites, African Americans are incarcerated 6.4 times higher for violent offenses, 4.four times college for property offenses and 9.4 times college for drug offenses.[22]

African Americans comprise a majority of the prison reentry population, however few studies have been aimed at studying backsliding among this population. Recidivism is highest amongst those under the age of 18 who are male person and African American, and African Americans take significantly higher levels of recidivism as compared to whites.[23]

The sheer number of ex-inmates exiting prison into the community is meaning, however, chances of backsliding are depression for those who avoid contact with the police for at to the lowest degree three years after release.[24] The communities ex-inmates are released into play a role in their likelihood to re-offend; release of African American ex-inmates into communities with higher levels of racial inequality (i.e. communities where poverty and joblessness impact members of one ethnicity more so than others) has been shown to be correlated with higher rates of backsliding, possibly due to the ex-inmates beingness "isolated from employers, health intendance services, and other institutions that can facilitate a law-abiding reentry into lodge".[23]

Employment and recidivism [edit]

Most research regarding backsliding indicates that those ex-inmates that obtain employment after release from prison house tend to take lower rates of backsliding.[21] In one study, it was found that fifty-fifty if marginal employment, especially for ex-inmates over the age of 26, is offered to ex-inmates, those ex-inmates are less likely to commit crime than their counterparts.[24] Another study establish that ex-inmates were less likely to re-offend if they found and maintained stable employment throughout their first year of parole.[25]

African Americans are unduly represented in the American prison system, representing approximately half the prison house population.[23] Of this population, many enter into the prison house system with less than a high school diploma.[26] The lack of education makes ex-inmates qualify for low-skill, low-wage employment. In addition to lack of instruction, many inmates report a difficulty in finding employment prior to incarceration.[21] If an ex-inmate served a long prison sentence, they have lost an opportunity to gain work experience or network with potential chore employers. Because of this, employers and agencies that aid with employment believe that ex-inmates cannot obtain or maintain employment.[21]

For African American ex-inmates, their race is an added barrier to obtaining employment later on release. According to one study, African Americans are more probable to re-offend because employment opportunities are non equally available in the communities they return to in relation to whites.[27]

Education and Recidivism [edit]

Teaching has been shown to reduce recidivism rates. When inmates use educational programs while within incarceration they are roughly 43% less likely to recidivate than those who received no education while incarcerated.[28] Inmates, in regards to partaking in educational programs, tin improve cognitive ability, work skills besides every bit being able to further their education upon release. Maryland, Minnesota and Ohio were involved in a study pertaining to education and recidivism. The study found that when the participant group of released offenders took educational classes while inside the confines of prison house, they had lower rates of recidivism as well as higher rates of employment.[29] Moreover, the higher the inmates educational level the lower their odds of recidivating becomes. If an inmate attains a document of vocation their rate of recidivism reduces by 14.half dozen%, if they attain a GED their rate of backsliding reduces by 25%, or if they attain an Associates in Arts or Associates in Science their rate of recidivism is reduced by 70%.[30] Tax payers are adversely afflicted as their tax money goes into the prison organization instead of other places of society.[31] Educating inmates is too cost effective. When investing in educational activity, it could drastically reduce incarceration costs. For a one dollar investment in educational programs, at that place would be a reduction of costs of incarceration by almost five dollars.[28] Pedagogy reduces backsliding rates which can reduce cost of incarceration as well equally reduce the number of people who commit crime within the community.[28]

Reducing recidivism among African Americans [edit]

A cultural re-grounding of African Americans is important to improve self-esteem and help develop a sense of community.[32] Culturally specific programs and services that focus on characteristics that include the target population values, beliefs, and styles of problem solving may be benign in reducing recidivism amongst African American inmates;[ citation needed ] programs involving social skills training and social problem solving could also be effective.[33]

For case, research shows that treatment effectiveness should include cerebral-behavioral and social learning techniques of modeling, role playing, reinforcement, extinction, resource provision, concrete verbal suggestions (symbolic modeling, giving reasons, prompting) and cognitive restructuring; the effectiveness of the intervention incorporates a relapse prevention chemical element. Relapse prevention is a cognitive-behavioral approach to cocky-direction that focuses on educational activity alternating responses to high-risk situations.[34] Research besides shows that restorative justice approaches to rehabilitation and reentry coupled with the therapeutic benefits of working with plants, say through urban agriculture, lead to psychosocial healing and reintegration into one's former community.[33]

Several theories suggest that access to low-skill employment among parolees is likely to have favorable outcomes, at to the lowest degree over the curt term, by strengthening internal and external social controls that constrain behavior toward legal employment. Whatsoever legal employment upon release from prison house may assistance to tip the balance of economic selection toward not needing to engage in criminal activity.[35] Employment as a turning point enhances attachment and delivery to mainstream individuals and pursuits. From that perspective, ex-inmates are constrained from criminal acts because they are more probable to weigh the take a chance of severing social ties prior to engaging in illegal behavior and opt to refuse to engage in criminal activity.[35]

In 2015, a bipartisan effort, headed by Koch family foundations and the ACLU, reforms to reduce backsliding rates among depression-income minority communities were appear with major back up across political ideologies. President Obama has praised these efforts who noted the unity will lead to an improved situation of the prison arrangement.[36] [37]

There is greater indication that education in prison helps preclude reincarceration.[38]

Studies [edit]

There have been hundreds of studies on the relationship betwixt correctional interventions and backsliding. These studies evidence that a reliance on only supervision and punitive sanctions can really increase the likelihood of someone reoffending, while well-implemented prison house and reentry programs tin substantially reduce recidivism.[39] Counties, states, and the federal government volition often commission studies on trends in recidivism, in addition to research on the impacts of their programming.

Minnesota [edit]

The Minnesota Department of Corrections did a study on criminals who are in prison to encounter if rehabilitation during incarceration correlates with backsliding or saved the state money. They used the Minnesota's Challenge Incarceration Program (CIP) which consisted of iii phases. The first was a six-calendar month institutional stage followed past ii aftercare phases, each lasting at least six months, for a total of almost eighteen months. The first phase was the "kicking campsite" phase. Here, inmates had daily schedules sixteen hours long where they participated in activities and showed subject area. Some activities in phase one included physical training, manual labor, skills training, drug therapy, and transition planning. The second and third phases were called "customs phases." In phase two the participants are on intensive supervised release (ISR). ISR includes being in contact with your supervisor on a daily basis, being a full-time employee, keeping curfew, passing random drug and alcohol tests, and doing community service while continuing to participate completely in the program. The last stage is stage three. During this phase one is still on ISR and has to remain in the customs while maintaining a full-time job. They have to go on with community service and their participation in the program. Once phase iii is consummate participants take "graduated" CIP. They are and then put on supervision until the end of their sentence. Inmates who driblet out or fail to complete the program are sent back to prison to serve the rest of their sentence. Information was gathered through a quasi experimental pattern. This compared the recidivism rates of the CIP participants with a control grouping. The findings of the report accept shown that the CIP program did not significantly reduce the chances of recidivism. However, CIP did increase the amount of time before rearrest. Moreover, CIP early on release graduates lower the costs for the state by millions every twelvemonth.[40]

Kentucky [edit]

A study was done past Robert Stanz in Jefferson County, Kentucky, which discussed an alternative to jail time. The alternative was "home incarceration" in which the defendant would complete his or her time at habitation instead of in jail. Co-ordinate to the report: "Results show that the majority of offenders practise successfully complete the plan, but that a majority are likewise re-arrested inside 5 years of completion."[41] In doing this, they added to the charge per unit of recidivism. In doing a written report on the results of this programme, Stanz considered age, race, neighborhood, and several other aspects. Nearly of the defendants who brutal under the recidivism category included those who were younger, those who were sentenced for multiple charges, those accruing fewer technical violations, males, and those of African-American descent.[41] In contrast, a study published past the African Journal of Criminology and Justice Studies in 2005 used information from the Louisiana Department of Public Safety and Corrections to examine 2,810 juvenile offenders who were released in the 1999/2000 fiscal yr. The study congenital a socio-demographic of the offenders who were returned to the correctional organization within a year of release. There was no significant difference between black offenders and white offenders. The study concluded that race does non play an important part in juvenile backsliding. The findings ran counter to conventional behavior on the subject, which may non have controlled for other variables.[42]

Methadone maintenance therapy (MMT) [edit]

A report was conducted regarding the backsliding rate of inmates receiving MMT (Methadone Maintenance Therapy). This therapy is intended to wean heroin users from the drug by administering pocket-size doses of methadone, thereby avoiding withdrawal symptoms. 589 inmates who took part in MMT programs betwixt Nov 22, 2005, and October 31, 2006, were observed after their release. Amidst these old inmates, "there was no statistically significant outcome of receiving methadone in the jail or dosage on subsequent recidivism risks".[43]

United States, nationwide [edit]

Male prisoners are exposed and field of study to sexual and concrete violence in prisons. When these events occur, the victim commonly suffers emotionally and physically. Studies propose that this leads the inmate to accept these types of behaviors and value their lives and the lives of others less when they are released. These dehumanizing acts, combined with learned violent behavior, are implicated in higher recidivism rates.[44] Two studies were done to attempt to provide a "national" backsliding rate for the United states of america. One was washed in 1983 which included 108,580 state prisoners from xi different states. The other study was done in 1994 on 272,111 prisoners from xv states. Both studies represent two-thirds of the overall prisoners released in their respective years.[45] An image developed by Matt Kelley indicates the percent of parolees returning to prison in each state in 2006. According to this image, in 2006, there was more recidivism in the southern states, peculiarly in the Midwestern region. Still, for the majority, the data is spread out throughout the regions.

Rikers Island, New York, New York [edit]

The recidivism rate in the New York Urban center jail system is as high every bit 65%. The jail at Rikers Isle, in New York, is making efforts to reduce this statistic by teaching horticulture to its inmates. It is shown that the inmates that become through this blazon of rehabilitation have significantly lower rates of backsliding.[46]

Arizona and Nevada [edit]

A written report by the University of Nevada, Reno on recidivism rates across the U.s. showed that, at only 24.6 percent, Arizona has the everyman charge per unit of recidivism amidst offenders compared to all other U.s.a. states.[47] Nevada has one of the everyman rates of backsliding among offenders at only 29.2 pct.[47]

California [edit]

The recidivism charge per unit in California as of 2008–2009 is 61%.[48] Recidivism has reduced slightly in California from the years of 2002 to 2009 by 5.2%.[48] However, California all the same has one of the highest recidivism rates in the nation. This high recidivism rate contributes profoundly to the overcrowding of jails and prisons in California.[49]

Connecticut [edit]

A report conducted in Connecticut followed 16,486 prisoners for a three-yr period to see how many of them would end up going back to jail. Results from the study plant that about 63% of offenders were rearrested for a new crime and sent to prison once again within the first three years they were released. Of the 16,486 prisoners, almost 56% of them were convicted of a new crime.[50]

Florida [edit]

In 2001, the Florida Section of Corrections created a graph showing the general recidivism charge per unit of all offenders released from prison house from July 1993 until half dozen and a half years afterwards. This graph shows that recidivism is much more likely within the first six months after they are released. The longer the offenders stayed out of prison, the less probable they were to return.[51]

Causes [edit]

A 2011 study found that harsh prison conditions, including isolation, tended to increase recidivism, though none of these effects were statistically pregnant.[52] Various researchers have noted that prisoners are stripped of civil rights and are reluctantly absorbed into communities – which further increases their alienation and isolation. Other contributors to recidivism include the difficulties released offenders face in finding jobs, in renting apartments or in getting education. Owners of businesses will often refuse to hire a convicted felon and are at all-time hesitant, peculiarly when filling whatsoever position that entails fifty-fifty small-scale responsibility or the handling of money (notation that this includes nearly work), especially to those convicted of thievery, such equally larceny, or to drug addicts.[44] Many leasing corporations (those organisations and people who own and rent apartments) every bit of 2017[update] routinely perform criminal background checks and disqualify ex-convicts. However, especially in the inner city or in areas with high criminal offense rates, lessors may not e'er utilise their official policies in this regard. When they exercise, apartments may be rented past someone other than the occupant. People with criminal records report difficulty or inability to find educational opportunities, and are often denied financial assist based on their records. In the United States of America, those found guilty of even a minor misdemeanor (in some states, a commendation criminal offense, such as a traffic ticket)[ citation needed ] or misdemeanour drug offence (e.g. possession of marijuana or heroin) while receiving Federal student aid are butterfingers from receiving further aid for a specified period of time.[53]

Policies addressing backsliding [edit]

Countless policies aim to ameliorate recidivism, only many involve a complete overhaul of societal values concerning justice, punishment, and second chances.[ citation needed ] Other proposals have little touch due to cost and resources issues and other constraints. Plausible approaches include:

  1. allowing electric current trends to go along without additional intervention (maintaining the status-quo)
  2. increasing the presence and quality of pre-release services (within incarceration facilities) that address factors associated with (for example) drug-related misdeed—addiction handling and mental-health counseling and education programs/vocational training
  3. increasing the presence and quality of community-based organizations that provide post-release/reentry services (in the aforementioned areas mentioned in arroyo 2)

The current criminal-justice system focuses on the forepart (arrest and incarceration), and largely ignores the tail-end (and preparation for the tail-end), which includes rehabilitation and re-entry into the community. In most correctional facilities, if planning for re-entry takes place at all, it but begins a few weeks or months before the release of an inmate. "This process is frequently referred to every bit release planning or transition planning and its parameters may exist largely express to helping a person identify a place to stay upon release and, possibly, a source of income."[54] A judge in Missouri, David Mason, believes the Transcendental Meditation program is a successful tool for rehabilitation. Stonemason and four other Missouri state and federal judges accept sentenced offenders to learn the Transcendental Meditation programme every bit an anti-backsliding modality.[55]

Mental disorders [edit]

Psychopaths may have a markedly distorted sense of the potential consequences of their actions, not only for others, only too for themselves. They do not, for example, deeply recognize the risk of being caught, disbelieved or injured as a result of their behaviour.[56] However, numerous studies and recent large-scale meta-analysis bandage serious doubt on claims made about the ability of psychopathy ratings to predict who will offend or answer to handling.[57] [58] [59] [60] [61] [62] [63] [64]

In 2002, Carmel stated that the term recidivism is often used in the psychiatric and mental health literature to mean "rehospitalization", which is problematic because the concept of recidivism generally refers to criminal reoffense.[65] Carmel reviewed the medical literature for articles with recidivism (vs. terms like rehospitalization) in the title and found that articles in the psychiatric literature were more likely to use the term backsliding with its criminological connotation than articles in the rest of medicine, which avoided the term. Carmel suggested that "every bit a means of decreasing stigmatization of psychiatric patients, we should avoid the discussion 'backsliding' when what we hateful is 'rehospitalization'". A 2016 followup by Peirson argued that "public policy makers and leaders should be careful to not misuse the word and unwittingly stigmatize persons with mental disease and substance use disorders".[66]

Law and economics [edit]

The law and economics literature has provided various justifications for the fact that the sanction imposed on an offender depends on whether he was bedevilled previously. In particular, some authors such as Rubinstein (1980) and Polinsky and Rubinfeld (1991) accept argued that a record of prior offenses provides information about the offender'southward characteristics (e.thou., a higher-than-average propensity to commit crimes).[67] [68] Even so, Shavell (2004) has pointed out that making sanctions depend on criminal offense history may be advantageous even when there are no characteristics to be learned about. In particular, Shavell (2004, p. 529) argues that when "detection of a violation implies not just an immediate sanction, but likewise a higher sanction for a future violation, an individual will be deterred more from committing a violation presently".[69] Building on Shavell'due south (2004) insights, Müller and Schmitz (2015) show that it may actually be optimal to further amplify the overdeterrence of repeat offenders when exogenous restrictions on penalties for commencement-fourth dimension offenders are relaxed.[seventy]

Run across as well [edit]

  • Bastøy Prison
  • Habitual offender
  • Incapacitation (penology)
  • Incarceration
  • Incarceration in Norway
  • Serial killer
  • Addiction

References [edit]

  1. ^ Henslin, James. Social Bug: A Down-To-Earth Approach, 2008.
  2. ^ a b "2018 Update on Prisoner Recidivism: A ix-Year Follow-upwardly Period (2005-2014)" (PDF). bjs.gov. U.S. Department of Justice Function of Justice Programs Agency of Justice Statistics. May 2018. Retrieved 18 November 2019. Public Domain This article incorporates text from this source, which is in the public domain .
  3. ^ Public Safety Performance Project, State of Recidivism: The Revolving Door of America's Prisons, The Pew Center on the States (April 2011), "Archived copy" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on 2014-06-11. Retrieved 2014-07-16 . {{cite spider web}}: CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link).
  4. ^ "In one case a criminal, e'er a criminal?". CBS News. Archived from the original on 2015-07-sixteen.
  5. ^ a b c d Visher, Christy A. 2003. "Transitions From Prison To Community: Understanding Individual Pathways". The Urban Institute, Justice Policy Center, Washington, District of Columbia.
  6. ^ Hyperakt (2020-06-02). "Vera Institute". Vera . Retrieved 2020-06-03 .
  7. ^ Henrichson, C. & Delaney, R. "The Price of Prisons". Vera Institute of Justice. 2012.
  8. ^ Guerino, Paul; Harrison, Paige Grand.; Sabol, William J. (2011). "Prisoners in 2010" (PDF). Washington, D.C.: U.South. Section of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics. NCJ 236096. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2015-06-08.
  9. ^ Hammett, T.; Roberts, C.; Kennedy, S. (2001). "Health-Related Issues in Prisoner Reentry". Crime & Delinquency. 47 (3): 390–409. doi:10.1177/0011128701047003006. S2CID 74397616.
  10. ^ "Treating Offenders with Drug Problems: Integrating Public Health and Public Safety" (PDF). Bethesda, Maryland: National Institute on Drug Corruption. 2009. Archived from the original (PDF) on 21 April 2013. Retrieved 26 May 2014.
  11. ^ "Addiction and the Criminal Justice Arrangement". U.South. Section of Health and Human being Services, National Institutes of Health. 2010. Archived from the original on 2012-03-08.
  12. ^ Reentry Policy Council (January 2005). "Charting the Safe and Successful Return of Prisoners to the Customs". New York: The Council of Country Governments. p. II-B-12–3. Archived from the original on 2014-10-20.
  13. ^ Whitten, Lori (2012). "Post-Prison Handling Reduces Backsliding Among Women With Substance Use Problems". Corrections & Mental Health. National Institute of Corrections. Archived from the original on 28 May 2014. Retrieved 26 May 2014.
  14. ^ a b Sterbenz, Christina (11 Dec 2014). "Why Norway's prison system is so successful". Business Insider . Retrieved 17 June 2020.
  15. ^ "Agency of Justice Statistics Recidivism of Prisoners Released in 1994" (PDF). Ojp.usdoj.gov. 2002-06-02. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2012-01-24. Retrieved 2009-09-14 .
  16. ^ Sawyer, Wendy; Wagner, Peter (March 19, 2019). "Mass Incarceration: The Whole Pie 2019". www.prisonpolicy.org . Retrieved 2019-03-29 .
  17. ^ Roots, Roger (Fall 2004), "When the Past is a Prison: The Hardening Plight of the American Ex-Captive", Justice Policy Periodical, ane (three)
  18. ^ a b Kirchner, Julia Angwin, Surya Mattu, Jeff Larson, Lauren (23 May 2016). "Machine Bias: There's Software Used Beyond the Land to Predict Time to come Criminals. And it'due south Biased Against Blacks". ProPublica. Archived from the original on 17 Nov 2017.
  19. ^ open access Hodwitz, Omi (2019). "The Terrorism Recidivism Written report (TRS): Examining Backsliding Rates for Post-9/11 Offenders". Perspectives on Terrorism. 13 (2): 54–64. ISSN 2334-3745. JSTOR 26626865. {{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  20. ^ a b c d Tripoli, Stephen J.; Kim, Johnny South.; Bough, Kimberly (2010). "Is employment associated with reduced recidivism?: The circuitous relationship betwixt employment and crime". International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology. 54 (5): 706–20. doi:10.1177/0306624X09342980. PMID 19638472. S2CID 41445079.
  21. ^ Hartney, C. and Vuong, Fifty. "Created Equal: Racial and Indigenous Disparities in the Usa Criminal Justice Arrangement" (2009).
  22. ^ a b c Reisig, Michael D.; Bales, William D.; Hay, Carter; Wang, Xia (September 2007). "The Effect of Racial Inequality on Black Male Backsliding". Justice Quarterly. 24 (3): 408–34. doi:10.1080/07418820701485387. S2CID 144968287.
  23. ^ a b Uggen, Christopher (August 2000). "Work As A Turning Bespeak In The Life Course of Criminals: A Duration Model Of Age, Employment, And Recidivism". American Sociological Review. 65 (4): 529–546. doi:10.2307/2657381. JSTOR 2657381.
  24. ^ Makarios, Thousand.; B. Steiner and L.F. Travis III (2010). "Examining the Predictors of Recidivism among Men and Women Released from Prison house in Ohio". Criminal Justice and Behavior. 37 (12): 1377–1391. doi:10.1177/0093854810382876. S2CID 145456810.
  25. ^ Freeman, Richard B. "Can we shut the revolving door?: Recidivism vs. employment of ex-offenders in the Usa." (2003).
  26. ^ Bellair, P. E.; Kowalski, B. R. (4 May 2011). "Low-Skill Employment Opportunity and African American-White Divergence in Backsliding". Journal of Research in Criminal offense and Malversation. 48 (ii): 176–208. doi:10.1177/0022427810391536. S2CID 145407579.
  27. ^ a b c Department of Justice, "Justice and Education Departments Announce New Inquiry Showing Prison Pedagogy Reduces Recidivism, Saves Money, Improves Employment" Archived 2018-02-01 at the Wayback Machine, "Department of Justice Role of Public Affairs", August 22, 2013
  28. ^ Steurer, Stephen J. and Linda G. Smith, "Didactics Reduces Crime, 3-State Recidivism Study", "MTC Institute and The Correctional Education Institute", February 2003
  29. ^ Nevada Department of Corrections, "Education Services Newsletter" Archived 2017-12-01 at the Wayback Machine, "NDOC", Winter 2009
  30. ^ "The Loftier Budgetary Cost of Incarceration" Archived 2017-12-01 at the Wayback Auto, "Center for Economic and Policy Research", 2010
  31. ^ Compare: Wooldredge, John; Hartman, Jennifer; Latessa, Edward; Holmes, Stephen (October 1994). "Effectiveness of Culturally Specific Customs Treatment for African American Juvenile Felons". Crime & Delinquency. xl (4): 589–98. doi:x.1177/0011128794040004007. S2CID 146477078. The Community Corrections Partnership (CCP) Program focuses on the cultural regrounding of African American boys to improve their self-esteem and help them to develop a sense of community. [...] This commodity presents results from a study of rearrests among juveniles who have completed the program and a comparison group of youths who underwent probation. The findings revealed that CCP did no improve than regular probation for preventing recidivism amidst these juveniles.
  32. ^ a b Sbicca, Joshua (2016). "These Confined Can't Hold Us Back: Plowing Incarcerated Geographies with Restorative Food Justice". Antipode. 48 (5): 1359–79. doi:ten.1111/anti.12247.
  33. ^ Dowden, Craig; Antonowicz, Daniel; Andrews, D.A. (October 2003). "The effectiveness of relapse prevention with offenders". International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology. 47 (5): 516–28. doi:10.1177/0306624x03253018. PMID 14526593. S2CID 26561127.
  34. ^ a b Kowalski, Brian R; Bellair, Paul E (May 2011). "Depression-Skill Employment Opportunity and African American-White Departure in Backsliding". Journal of Enquiry in Law-breaking and Malversation. 48 (ii): 183. doi:x.1177/0022427810391536. S2CID 145407579.
  35. ^ Mak, Tim (January xiii, 2015). "Koch Bros to Bankroll Prison Reform". The Daily Creature. Archived from the original on 2016-02-21.
  36. ^ Nelson, Colleen Mccain; Fields, Gary (Jul 16, 2015). "Obama, Koch Brothers in Unlikely Alliance to Overhaul Criminal Justice". Wall Street Journal. Archived from the original on 2017-02-xvi.
  37. ^ SpearIt (2016-01-06). "Keeping It Existent: Why Congress Must Act to Restore Pell Grant Funding for Prisoners". Rochester, NY: Social Scientific discipline Research Network. SSRN 2711979.
  38. ^ Lipsey, Mark Due west.; Cullen, Francis T. (December 2007). "The Effectiveness of Correctional Rehabilitation: A Review of Systematic Reviews". Annual Review of Law and Social Science. 3 (1): 297–320. doi:10.1146/annurev.lawsocsci.3.081806.112833. ISSN 1550-3585.
  39. ^ Duwe, Chiliad., & Kerschner, D. 2008. "Removing a Smash From the Bury." Criminal offence & Delinquency, 54.
  40. ^ a b Stanz, Robert (2000). "Predictors of Success and Recidivism in a Home Incarceration Programme". Prison Periodical. fourscore (3): 326–45. doi:10.1177/0032885500080003006. S2CID 145251818.
  41. ^ Mbuba, Jospeter Yard. (November 2005). "A Refutation of Racial Differentials in the Juvenile Recidivism Charge per unit Hypothesis". African Journal of Criminology and Justice Studies. ane (ii). ISSN 1554-3897. Accessed 2011-06-26.
  42. ^ McMillan, Garnett P, 2008, "The effect of a jail methadone maintenance therapy (MMT) program on inmate backsliding", Addiction, 103:2017–23.
  43. ^ a b Bailey, Kristen. "The Causes of Backsliding in the Criminal Justice System and Why It Is Worth the Price to Address Them", Nashville Bar Journal, Dec 06/Jan 07, 21 Apr 2009.
  44. ^ Bureau of Justice Statistics (2002-x-25). "Bureau of Justice Statistics Reentry Trends in the U.S.: Recidivism". U.s.a. Dept. of Justice. Archived from the original on 26 Apr 2009. Retrieved 2014-05-26 .
  45. ^ Jiler, James. "Doing Time in the Garden: Life Lessons Through Prison house Horticulture." New Village Press. 2006. (Apr 21, 2009).
  46. ^ a b Ryan, Cy. "Written report suggests Nevada prisons do pretty good job of preventing backsliding". Las Vegas Sun. Archived from the original on 2009-11-fourteen. Retrieved 2009-09-xiv .
  47. ^ a b California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, "2013 Outcome Evaluation" Archived 2017-08-22 at the Wayback Motorcar, "California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation Role of Research", January 2014
  48. ^ "Strategic Growth Plan". Part of Governor (California). Archived from the original on 2009-09-eleven. Retrieved 2009-09-xiv .
  49. ^ Part of Policy Management (2009-01-06). "Recidivism Study". Country of Connecticut. Archived from the original on 2010-06-16. Retrieved 2009-09-fourteen .
  50. ^ Florida Department of Corrections (May 2001). "Recidivism Rate Curves". Recidivism Report. Land of Florida. Archived from the original on 2010-03-15. Retrieved 2009-09-14 .
  51. ^ Drago, Francesco; Galbiati, Roberto; Vertova, Pietro (February 1, 2011) [2011]. "Prison house Weather condition and Backsliding". American Law and Economics Review. 13 (ane): 103–30. doi:10.1093/aler/ahq024.
  52. ^ "FAFSA Facts" (PDF). whitehouse.gov. Archived (PDF) from the original on 23 January 2017. Retrieved 24 June 2015 – via National Athenaeum.
  53. ^ Reentry Policy Council (January 2005). "Charting the Safe and Successful Render of Prisoners to the Customs". New York: The Council of Country Governments. p. xi. Archived from the original on 2012-04-03.
  54. ^ "Missouri Sentences Convicts To Transcendental Meditation". Americans United for the Separation of Church and State. May 2006. Archived from the original on 12 October 2013. Retrieved 26 May 2014.
  55. ^ Dadds; et al. (September 2006). "Attending to the eyes and fear-recognition deficits in kid psychopathy". The British Journal of Psychiatry. 189 (3): 280–81. doi:10.1192/bjp.bp.105.018150. PMID 16946366.
  56. ^ Yang, Thou; Wong, SC; Coid, J (September 2010). "The efficacy of violence prediction: a meta-analytic comparison of 9 risk cess tools". Psychol Balderdash. 136 (5): 740–67. CiteSeerXx.1.ane.404.4396. doi:10.1037/a0020473. PMID 20804235.
  57. ^ Singh, JP; Grann, One thousand; Fazel, Due south (xiii December 2010). "A comparative report of violence adventure assessment tools: a systematic review and metaregression analysis of 68 studies involving 25,980 participants". Clin Psychol Rev (published Apr 2011). 31 (3): 499–513. doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2010.11.009. PMID 21255891.
  58. ^ Franklin, Karen (June 2011). "Violence risk meta-meta: Musical instrument option does matter: Despite popularity, psychopathy test and actuarials not superior to other prediction methods". Archived from the original on 2013-09-23.
  59. ^ Franklin, Karen (May 2012). "SVP risk tools evidence 'disappointing' reliability in real-world use". Archived from the original on 2013-09-23.
  60. ^ Edens, John F.; Boccaccini, Marcus T.; v Johnson, Darryl W. (Jan–Feb 2010). "Inter-rater reliability of the PCL-R total and factor scores among psychopathic sexual activity offenders: are personality features more prone to disagreement than behavioral features?". Behav Sci Police. 28 (1): 106–nineteen. doi:10.1002/bsl.918. PMID 20101592.
  61. ^ Singh, Jay P.; Grann, Martin; Fazel, Seena (2013). "Authorship Bias in Violence Risk Assessment? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis". PLOS I. 8 (9): e72484. Bibcode:2013PLoSO...872484S. doi:ten.1371/periodical.pone.0072484. PMC3759386. PMID 24023744.
  62. ^ Crighton, David (2009). "Uses and Abuses of the Hare Psychopathy Checklist". Evid Based Ment Wellness. 12 (ii): 33–36. doi:10.1136/ebmh.12.2.33. PMID 19395597. S2CID 28269115. Archived from the original on 2014-05-27.
  63. ^ Walters, Glenn D. (Apr 2004). "The Problem with Psychopathy as a Full general Theory of Criminal offence". International Periodical of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology. 48 (ii): 133–48. doi:10.1177/0306624X03259472. PMID 15070462. S2CID 40939723. Archived from the original on 2015-11-19.
  64. ^ Carmel H. "Rehospitalization" versus "recidivism" (alphabetic character). American Journal of Psychiatry, 159:1949,2002. https://ajp.psychiatryonline.org/doi/full/10.1176/appi.ajp.159.11.1949
  65. ^ Peirson, R.P. Locking Away "Recidivism". Adm Policy Ment Wellness 43, 479–481 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-015-0646-nine
  66. ^ Rubinstein, Ariel (1980). "On an bibelot of the deterrent issue of penalization". Economic science Messages. 6 (1): 89–94. doi:x.1016/0165-1765(80)90062-ii. ISSN 0165-1765.
  67. ^ Mitchell Polinsky, A.; Rubinfeld, Daniel 50. (1991). "A model of optimal fines for repeat offenders" (PDF). Periodical of Public Economic science. 46 (3): 291–306. doi:ten.1016/0047-2727(91)90009-Q. ISSN 0047-2727.
  68. ^ Shavell, Steven (2004). Foundations of Economical Analysis of Law. Harvard University Press. ISBN9780674043497.
  69. ^ Müller, Daniel; Schmitz, Patrick W. (2015). "Overdeterrence of echo offenders when penalties for first-fourth dimension offenders are restricted". Economics Letters. 129: 116–120. doi:10.1016/j.econlet.2015.02.010. ISSN 0165-1765.

External links [edit]

  • "Recidivism". Encyclopædia Britannica. Vol. 22 (11th ed.). 1911.
  • Higher Didactics in Prison at Hudson link
  • Recidivism in Republic of finland 1993–2001
  • United states Recidivism Statistics
  • Prisoner Recidivism Bureau of Justice Statistics
  • recidivism.com Curated articles and information

scottforlanstry.blogspot.com

Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recidivism

Ces posts pourraient vous intéresser

Enregistrer un commentaire for "How Many People Are Jailed Again"